Monday, March 02, 2015
Human sacrifice in Hawaii--death trap crossings demonstrate failure to provide even the simplest protections
“A typical traffic signal is not appropriate for the crosswalk because it is close to the heavily traveled Castle Junction intersection at Pali and Kamehameha highways, and because the area in front of HPU did not meet the minimum requirement of five pedestrian "incidents" in a 12-month period”—Department of Transportation spokesman Dan Meisenzahl after the death of HPU student Mariah Danforth-Moore
by Larry Geller
I put my smartphone to work as a dashboard camera this weekend to survey crosswalks on one street in Honolulu. The results (below) document a failure of public policy that has resulted in avoidable deaths each year in the city.Hawaii continues to lead the nation in per capita deaths for older pedestrians.
According to Smart Growth America's "Dangerous by Design 2014," Hawaii has the highest fatality rate in the nation per capita for older pedestrians, with 6.81 deaths per every 100,000 adults 65 and older from 2003 to 2010.
Year after year after year, the carnage is allowed to continue. Meanwhile, it appears that the state department of transportation requires “incidents” before making badly needed modifications. And those modifications are made piecemeal, rather than as part of a plan to reduce the collision rate. Year after year, no change, no improvements.
And no one is fired from the departments that allow these avoidable deaths to occur.
Those are strong words, but easy to substantiate. Yesterday I let the dashboard camera run while driving along S. King Street. Below you will see snapshots of each crosswalk that is not traffic-light controlled between town and University Avenue.
Note that only one of them has a blinking light setup and signage across the road, an arrangement very likely to be seen by motorists in each traffic lane. A problem with crossing on S. King St., that is, taking your chances on being killed in order to get across the street, is that a car might stop in a near lane, but drivers in the next lane from that cannot see you and may not stop. To cross cautiously means to poke your neck out at each lane, hoping cars will stop for you to go across. For an older and less attentive person, the maneuvering required might be difficult or impossible. So seniors, in particular, get killed.
The blinking overhead lights and signage would appear to provide a possible solution—so why is there only one crosswalk equipped like that?
Note also that some crosswalks have day-glo pedestrian crossing signs on both sides, some have none at all. Sometimes there is an extra set of day-glo signs indicating “pedestrian crossing ahead.” Mostly, these are absent.
Why is there inconsistency? If #humanlivesmatter then each intersection should be properly marked. If the blinking lights work, each intersection should have them. We should not have to wait until a certain number of “incidents” are counted.
It has been shown that putting signs or traffic lights over lanes increases their visibility to motorists. With regard to traffic signals, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices requires that they be positioned over each lane, according to a Kokua Line article printed last year:
"While this may appear to be an excessive use of traffic signals, studies have found significant safety benefits in locating one signal head per through lane when there is more than one through lane," [DTS Director Michael] Formby said.
[Star-Advertiser, Kokua Line, 8/14/2014]
The sixth picture down shows a crosswalk with not only blinking lights but overhead signage visible across each lane. Why is that not the minimum standard for S. King St., Pali Highway, and other streets where crosswalks are currently death traps?
Let’s begin our journey. Crosswalks at traffic light controlled intersections are skipped.
S. King St. / Birch St. – no signage
S. King St. / Cedar St. no signage
S. King St. / Sheridan St. sign on one side of the street only
S. King St. / nr. Washington Middle School signs on both sides of the street
S. King St. / Times Supermarket overhead signs, lights that might flash
There seems to be a pedestrian push-button at this crosswalk. I didn’t try it, but it should flash the lights, right?
S. King St. / Hauoli St. signs on one side of the street (the sign on the left side appears to be installed at the wrong corner (?) )
S. King St. / Pumehana St. signs on both sides of the street
S. King St. / Wiliwili St. no signs
S. King St. / Kemole Ln. no signs
S. King St. / Poha Ln. no signs
S. King St. / Hoawa Ln. no signs
S. King St. just past Isenberg St., pedestrian crossing ahead signs on both sides of the street
S. King / Coolidge St. signs on both sides of the street
So let’s add this up.
Crosswalks with no signs: 6
Crosswalks with one sign: 2
Crosswalks with two signs: 3
Crosswalks with overhead signs / blinking lights: 1
Total number of crosswalks surveyed: 12
The survey speaks for itself.
It also raises the question of consistency as a safety factor—do drivers get used to expecting signage before crosswalks, so that they become less attentive when those signs are missing?
More people will be killed at inadequately protected intersections.
No one will go to jail for this. No one will lose their jobs for this.
That is, unless ordinary citizens begin to get together and demand action.
I have often remarked on the lack of visibility for these crosswalks to passengers in my car. I had no idea it was so pervasive! The crosswalks without proper signage or flashing lights makes So. King street a very dangerous place for walkers indeed!
I am no expert on this, but I'll bet that making a crosswalk very visible by means of bright signs and/or blinking lights conditions drivers to expect that subsequent crosswalks will be similarly marked. And then, when they're not, it makes it more likely that drivers will not be fully attentive.
If blinking lights are needed for one crosswalk, what does that say about neglecting the others?
Links to this post: