Thursday, January 29, 2015
State Auditor posts scathing assessment of the Hawaii Health Connector
by Larry Geller
As you read this, recall that the legislature—I hate to use the mocking phrase “in its wisdom,” but it was a mistake I hope they won’t make again—created the Health Connector as an independent non-profit company. It then behaved like an independent company, not subject to the sunshine laws, for example. Then there is the issue of the governor’s appointments, including, most controversially perhaps, employees of near-monopoly insurers HMSA and Kaiser to its board. Finally, if the governor felt he had to have an HMSA employee (after all, they do understand health insurance…), why did he pick their chief lobbyist, instead of another knowledgeable person?
- Star-Advertiser editorial sides with consumers on health board appointments (3/23/2012)
- Senate poised to vote on Governor’s health insurance nominees… (4/3/2012) (includes video)
- Video defending health care policy in Hawaii—call to action (5/2/2012)
(from state auditor’s web page)
Audit of the Hawai‘i Health Connector
Report No. 15-01, January 2015
Hawai‘i enrolled only 14.8 percent of its expected 58,000 individuals between October 1, 2013, and April 19, 2014, ranking it 46th in the nation.
Inadequate planning and improper procurement led to an unsustainable Health Connector
Board of Directors’ inadequate planning led to an unsustainable health exchange
The Hawai‘i Health Connector Board of Directors and management could not agree on what Hawai‘i’s health insurance exchange could be or should be. The Connector board never made that fundamental decision but continued its work without a finalized strategic plan. As a result, the Connector is unsustainable due to high operating costs and Hawai‘i’s unique market of uninsured—only 8 percent of the population, about 100,000 residents. The interim executive director concluded that even with substantial reductions to the estimated $15 million annual operating budget, the Connector would not be sustainable. It would have to dramatically increase fees on participating exchange plans or the State would need to assess a fee across the market to preserve services.
In addition, the Connector did not have IT staff to manage the project’s development or monitor contracts, relying on vendors to self-report their progress. In addition, the board’s ability to monitor its massive IT system’s development progress was impaired by an uncooperative executive director who withheld information. Throughout the website development process, the board was largely unaware of the Connector’s myriad problems.
Connector did not properly procure and administer its contracts and monitor costs, putting federal grants at risk
The Connector received $204.4 million in federal grants to support the planning and establishment of Hawai‘i’s state-based health insurance exchange. We found the Connector did not properly procure or administer its contracts and circumvented its own procurement policies and procedures when hiring consultants. Contracts were awarded without following proper procedures to ensure competitive pricing and procurement documentation was disorganized or missing from most contract files. Many of the Connector’s IT consultant contracts were amended numerous times and costs ballooned as the Connector continued to rely on their services.
The Connector receives almost all its funds from grants awarded by the federal government. Strict federal regulations govern the use of these moneys. We noted numerous questionable travel and entertainment costs as well as unsupported severance pay. These questionable costs may be disallowed by the funding agency, and noncompliance with federal regulations may result in repayment of amounts or suspension and termination of a federal grant.
The Connector suggested minor technical changes to our report but generally agreed with our findings and recommendations.
Links to this post: