Tuesday, March 19, 2013

 

On the ten-year anniversary of the start of the Iraq war, Star-Advertiser is AWOL


by Larry Geller

evening post

For some papers, the tenth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq was front-page news, for others there was something inside. Then there are papers that ignored the anniversary altogether. Some will no doubt run a story tomorrow.

Since many troops based in Hawaii were called to the Iraq and Afghanistan war, you’d think there would be something in our daily paper. But no.

For the record, here is a list of Hawaii-based units that were deployed in the Persian Gulf region on the day when we invaded Iraq, snipped from a Star-Bulletin story:

Navy

    Destroyer USS Paul Hamilton (part of the USS Lincoln battle group)

    Frigate USS Reuben James (part of the USS Lincoln battle group)

    Frigate USS Crommelin

    Cruiser USS Chosin (part of the USS Nimitz battle group)

    Destroyer USS O'Kane

    Submarines (eight): USS Cheyenne, Honolulu, Louisville, Chicago, Columbia, Key West, Los Angeles and Pasadena

    Seabees: 20 belonging to the 30th Naval Construction Regiment at Pearl Harbor, and 10 reservists from Construction Battalion Maintenance Unit 303

Marines

    250 Marines from the 1st Radio Battalion from Kaneohe Bay

    40 reservists from the 4th Force Reconnaissance Marines

    200 Marines from Camp Smith at the Marines Central Command Headquarters in Bahrain who left in February 2002 as part of the war against terrorism

Army

    Reserves: 30th Military History detachment (three people) activated Feb. 10

    80 Schofield Barracks and Fort Shafter soldiers

Hawaii Air National Guard

    40 from 154th Security Forces Squadron

    24 from the 297th Air Traffic Control Squadron

    14 from Combat Communications Squadron

Coast Guard

    Buoy Tender Walnut with crew of 50


An editorial on page A10 at least mentions the anniversary, but starts off more concerned with opinion polls than with facts. The answers to "Was it worth it?" or "Is the United States more secure?" do not come from poll results.

The editorial grossly underestimates the death toll by reporting only the number of Iraqi deaths reported in the US media (110,000-121,227 civilian deaths, via Iraq Body Count) rather than more credible estimates that range up to 1.2 million. The editors picked the smallest number they could, rather than the most credible.

The main thrust of the Star-Advertiser editorial is a call for better treatment of returning vets, and that’s not only commendable but important to see in print. On the other hand, the vets would not need treatment had they not been deployed in the first place.

The paper did not mention that the public was lied to about WMD, nor does it admit the role that the commercial press played in beating the drums for war. It doesn’t discuss the cost of the war, which could ultimately reach $4 trillion. Yes, four trillion dollars, even as Republicans try to slash benefits for 99% of Americans, including vets. How is that number arrived at? For a full explanation, watch today’s Democracy Now or check out the printed transcript on their website:

On the 10th anniversary of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, we look at a massive new report by a team of 30 economists, anthropologists, political scientists, legal experts and physicians about the Iraq War’s impact. "The Costs of War" report found the total number of people who have died from the Iraq War, including soldiers, militants, police, contractors, journalists, humanitarian workers and Iraqi civilians, has reached at least 189,000 people, including at least 123,000 civilians. Financially, the report estimates a cost to U.S. taxpayers of $2.2 trillion, a figure that could one day approach $4 trillion with the interest accrued on the borrowed money used to fund the war.

 

costs“The Costs of War” report in full is here. For a useful summary, see this Common Dreams article.


costs1





Comments:

Thanks. I remember back in 04-07 watching the 3 Hawaii TV stations I could receive in my office, and what seemed like a solid stream of indistinguishable news programs and perpetually repeating commercials, thinking to myself: "WTF? Some old ladies selling cookies? A lost cat? Traffic? Aren't in the middle of a #^@&ing war? Where's the coverage? What about the money? The insider knowledge? WTC7? You call this news?!"

Thanks for pointing out the fact that these good ol' boy "party members" could be actually doing what they pretend to do.

Please note that at least one other person out there gives a sh!t.

 

Post a Comment

Requiring those Captcha codes at least temporarily, in the hopes that it quells the flood of comment spam I've been receiving.



Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This 

page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Newer›  ‹Older