Tuesday, October 20, 2015
Knock knock.Who’s there? Your accountant, and it’s time for the company to leave Hawaii
by Larry Geller
No joke, I’ve been writing about the futility of spending large gobs of taxpayer money developing high-tech jobs in Hawaii since at least 2006.
It’s not that there can’t be high-tech jobs in Hawaii (we already have them), but that we’re simply in the wrong place, so that at some point it makes sense that a company not be here. So does it make sense to subsidize companies that will ultimately hire people in other states, not in Hawaii?
This morning’s Tech View column in the Star-Advertiser is a perfect illustration of what typically (not occasionally) happens to startups and established tech companies alike when they realize that they can’t grow here, or their market or suppliers are elsewhere.
No matter how much the CEO likes living in Hawaii, or even when the startup makes sense, there comes a time when greener pastures elsewhere beckon irresistibly. Not always: we do have tech firms that stay here, but as a rule, if a company wants to grow and its talent, markets or suppliers are elsewhere, then it will go. Fact.
It is also hard to imagine that sinking more big bucks into high-tech without a realistic appraisal of return on investment makes any sense.
The state’s High Technology Development Corporation lists several objectives on its website. The last in their list is:
Build Hawaii’s reputation as the perfect place to do business
Hawaii is a perfect place if your business is renting surfboards to tourists, but as the entrepreneur in today’s Tech View column determined, not for his tech company. He moved his offices to California.
“While I had local customers,” [Ho‘ala Greevy] said, “I needed to get in front of the big players and be in a place where there were lots of potential customers. I also had to have access to capital and talent. For both of those components, you can’t be anywhere better than the Bay Area.”
Greevy has five employees and is certain he can find qualified workers if he needs to add more of them. His business has grown to encompass customers in 26 states plus Guam. He is convinced the current rate of growth couldn’t be sustained just with Hawaii customers.
[Star-Advertiser p. B6, Isle ground fertile, but some opt to go elsewhere to grow, 10/20/2015]
One after another, from VeriFone to Hoku Scientific, a recent Star-Advertiser darling, high-tech firms grow and create jobs elsewhere or move out entirely.
No matter how much taxpayer money our state plows into business development, we cannot escape the reality of our location in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. We cannot tow Oahu off to San Francisco Bay. We’re here and we need to get used to it.
That means we’re far from talent, markets, suppliers, and synergistic relationships with other high- and medium-tech companies (someone needs to make the PC boards or stock the MIL-spec stainless-steel screws).
There were other intangibles the Bay Area had that made the move work. Perhaps the most important of those was his ability to sell his product more readily as a mainland company than a Hawaii company. “No question,” said Greevy, “potential customers took us more seriously when we told them we’re a startup based in San Francisco.”
Right. So why is HTDC still dreaming that it can “Build Hawaii’s reputation as the perfect place to do business” when that reputation doesn’t even exist?
I’m just being realistic.
Imagine if the lost $1.7 billion of tax incentives(see box at right) could have been spent on truly affordable housing (at 40% max of area median income, not the 80%, 120% or 140% our newspaper likes to define as “affordable”).
We need to hold our legislators accountable. If they are truly concerned about the economy, they could enact a living wage, which for Hawaii would trend towards $25 an hour, not the mere $10 that will happen too late anyway.
Now, some part of that tax credit may have worked. The problem is, as the auditor pointed out, we just don’t know.
To play so fast and loose with taxpayer money is incompetence. Unfortunately, the only remedy is to install competence in the Legislature, which voters have not chosen to do.
Fiscal accountability and economic health can become part of good public policy. To do that will take first of all a more informed and involved electorate.
We cannot tow Oahu off to San Francisco Bay? I thought we're just off Baja California, right next to Alaska! ;-D
Links to this post: